OTA vs Direct Booking: Finding the Right Balance for Your Hotel
- OnlineHotelier
- Aug 14, 2024
- 2 min read
Updated: Sep 12
When it comes to hotel distribution, one of the most common questions hoteliers ask is:
“Should I focus more on OTAs or on direct bookings?”
Both have clear advantages and disadvantages. Let’s break it down step by step.
1. What Are OTAs in Hotels?
An OTA (Online Travel Agency) is a digital platform like MakeMyTrip, Goibibo, Booking.com, Agoda, or Expedia where travelers can search, compare, and book hotels online.
For hotels, OTAs act like visibility engines—putting your property in front of millions of travelers who may have never discovered you otherwise.
But with visibility comes a cost: commissions usually between 15%–25% per booking.
2. What Are Direct Bookings?
Direct bookings are reservations made through your hotel’s own channels:
Hotel website
Social media links
Walk-ins & phone calls
Email or WhatsApp campaigns
Direct bookings cut out the middleman, giving you more control, better margins, and stronger guest relationships.
3. OTA vs Direct Booking: Side-by-Side Comparison
Factor | OTA Bookings | Direct Bookings |
Visibility | Massive global reach via OTA marketing budgets | Dependent on your own website & SEO |
Commission | 15%–25% per booking | Zero commission |
Guest Data | OTA owns guest details, limited personalization | You own data for remarketing & loyalty |
Trust Factor | Guests trust OTAs for reviews & refund policies | Guests trust your brand once convinced |
Cancellations | Higher (sometimes 40%) | Lower (17%–20% on average) |
Loyalty Building | Weak, OTA brand is remembered | Strong, direct relationship with guests |
4. Why Hotels Need OTAs
Global Exposure – Appear where travelers are already searching.
Credibility Boost – Verified reviews and secure payment gateways.
Fill Gaps – OTAs help during low season and last-minute demand.
Marketing Support – Benefit from OTA ad spend without paying upfront.
5. Why Hotels Need Direct Bookings
Higher Profitability – No commissions.
Data Ownership – Build guest database for repeat sales.
Stronger Branding – Guests remember your hotel, not the OTA.
Upsell Opportunities – Offer add-ons like meals, spa, or upgrades.
Loyalty Programs – Convert one-time guests into repeat customers.
6. The Real Catch: Dependence on One Side
Relying only on OTAs means:
Shrinking profit margins
Higher cancellation risks
Weak control over guest data
Relying only on direct bookings means:
Limited reach
Higher marketing costs
Slower visibility growth
7. Best of Both Worlds: A Balanced Strategy
The smartest hotels in India use both OTAs and direct bookings strategically:
Use OTAs for exposure & demand generation.
Build your own website with SEO & Google Business Profile.
Run social media ads to retarget OTA guests for future direct stays.
Offer exclusive perks (late check-out, free breakfast) on direct bookings.
Use a Channel Manager to keep rates, inventory, and availability in sync.
Use a Booking Engine to smoothen the flow of booking for a Guest
Final Thoughts
In the OTA vs Direct Booking debate, there’s no single winner. OTAs give you reach, Direct bookings give you profitability.
For Indian hotels, the real success lies in striking the right balance—using OTAs as a launchpad while continuously building strong direct booking channels to secure long-term growth.
Pro Tip: Track your OTA vs Direct ratio monthly. A healthy balance is 60% OTA : 40% Direct for most independent hotels in India. Over time, aim to grow your direct share without losing the visibility OTAs provide.